Saturday, April 16, 2011

Reflecting On Holy Week

Some years ago I ran across this statement from Aeschylus, the 5th century B.C. Greek tragic dramatist: 
"He who learns must suffer. And even in our sleep 
pain that will not forget falls drop by drop
upon the heart. And in our despair, against our will
comes wisdom, by the awful grace of God."
(Agamemnon, 2nd Choral Ode)

That hit me right between the eyes, coming as it does from an unusual source. It represents to me a sort of summary of what Lent and Easter, and, indeed, the whole Church year, is about: a summary, really, of what our life is about.

I'm amazed at how often I catch myself being surprised and upset when suffering of hardship intrudes on the ordinariness of my life, as if it were something I should never expect to happen, as if somehow I should be immune to it, most of the time anyway. It's always inconvenient. It never fits my schedule, my timing. It has a way of appearing, unwanted, at the most inopportune times, and I often react angrily, with frustration, and eventually with embarrassment. And it is unrelenting: falling "drop by drop upon the heart."

The unconsoling, damnable truth of human and Christian life is that I can learn, can come to wisdom only through embracing my pain and suffering, and that, not even by my own resources and power, but only "by the awful grace of God."

Those men and women before us and with us now whom we call saints affirm and reaffirm over and over that this is the only way to God. In doing considerable research for a past project on classic and contemporary spiritual writers, I was struck by the absolute consistency of how each person, so different in terms of age, family or country of origin has arrived at virtually the same conclusion: that in order to live in Christ, in life, light and true consciousness, one must abandon, must permanently let go of all that smacks of death, darkness and sin. Permanently -- not just for a little while.

Despite the starkness of that reminder, I'm looking forward to Holy Week in which the community of faith will "enter with joy upon the contemplation of those mighty acts, whereby [He] has given us life..." (Collect at the Liturgy of the Palms, Palm Sunday) The liturgies this coming week are full of grace-laden droplets which, if I but allow them, can, together with pain and suffering, fall "drop by drop upon the heart." To single out just a few:

PALM SUNDAY:  "...Mercifully grant that we may walk in the way of his suffering and also share in his resurrection..."

SERVICE OF TENEBRAE ("SHADOWS/DARKNESS"):  "Christ for us became obedient unto death, even death on a cross..."

MAUNDY THURSDAY:  "Do you know what I, your Lord and Master, have done to you? I have given you an example, that you should do as I have done."

GOOD FRIDAY:  "We glory in your cross, O Lord, and praise and glorify your holy resurrection; for by virtue of your cross joy has come to the whole world."

GREAT VIGIL OF EASTER:  "Through the Paschal mystery...we are buried with Christ by Baptism into his death, and raised with him to newness of life."

SUNDAY OF THE RESURRECTION/EASTER:  "Grant us so to die daily to sin, that we may evermore live with him in the joy of his resurrection."

A blessed Pascha to each and all!       

Friday, April 15, 2011

Guest blogger: Nick Pope


Science Fiction, Ufology and Hollywood

By Nick Pope

The relationship between science fiction, ufology and the film industry is complex.  In this guest blog I want to do two main things.  Firstly, examine the relationship between sci-fi and ufology and secondly, take a look at the increasingly popular theory that the film industry (and Hollywood in particular) is part of an official campaign to acclimatise people to an extraterrestrial reality and indoctrinate them, by pushing certain key themes.

I write this article with three separate hats on: my Ministry of Defence background (mainly in relation to my time on the UFO project, but incorporating my more general knowledge of how government works); my position as a sci-fi author and someone who commentates on the genre in the media; and finally, as someone who works with various PR agencies and film companies to promote the release of new sci-fi movies.

Science Fiction Influencing Ufology

Skeptical ufologists have often said that sci-fi has a huge bearing on ufology.  At best, they say, it encourages people to believe any odd light in the sky is an alien spacecraft – the MoD received more UFO reports in 1978 (the year that Close Encounters of the Third Kind was released in the UK) than in any other year.  At worst, they suggest that sci-fi encourages people to make bogus claims of UFO sightings and alien abductions, inspired by the sorts of alien spacecraft and extraterrestrials that they see in various sci-fi films and TV series.  Do either of these theories stand up to scrutiny?  Yes and no.

Taking the Close Encounters of the Third Kind anecdote, this could simply be coincidence, but it’s impossible to tell whether there’s any connection between the movie and the number of UFO sightings reported to MoD.  How, short of re-interviewing every witness and probing their reasons for making a report, could you tell?  Does a sci-fi movie cause people to see a UFO?  No.  Might it make someone more inclined to think an unidentified light or object in the sky has a non-prosaic explanation?  It’s a possibility, but there’s no realistic way in which this could be measured.  

A more likely explanation is that a UFO-related sci-fi film will inspire various TV stations, radio stations, newspapers and magazines to run stories and features about the UFO phenomenon.  Indeed, such features are sometimes deliberately placed by film companies as part of a marketing campaign.  I’ve seen (and indeed written) numerous stories and features that begin with an introduction along the lines of “In the week in which X is released, we look into the UK’s best-known real-life alien encounters”.  Often, particularly in local papers, a UFO story will end with a phrase along the lines of “Did you see the UFO?  Have you had a sighting?  Call our news desk”.  What this does is create a more receptive environment than would normally be the case, making it more likely that someone who’s had a sighting will make a report (UFOs are under-reported, because witnesses fear they’ll be ridiculed or disbelieved, or simply because they don’t know who to contact). 

To summarise, sci-fi movies lead to more media coverage about UFOs and aliens, which may lead to a higher proportion of sightings being reported than would otherwise have been the case.  But measurement of any of this would be difficult, if not impossible.  One would need to do a comparative analysis using annual data on the total number of UFO sightings, and on the total number (and thus the proportion) actually reported.  But it’s impossible to quantify sightings that are never reported!  Moreover, one would need to somehow assign values reflecting the volume and impact of science fiction in any given year, and the volume and impact of associated media coverage, as well as determining the extent to which this impacted upon and influenced UFO witnesses.  Bottom line: there may be an influence, but we can’t be certain about this and could never measure it in any meaningful scientific way.

Ufology Influencing Science Fiction

It’s worth pointing out that the debate can be had the other way around.  Sci-fi writers and filmmakers have clearly studied ufology and drawn freely from material in the literature.  In many cases this is self-evident, as with films like Communion and Fire in the Sky, which are based on - though often take artistic licence with - testimony from UFO witnesses and abductees.  But other sci-fi films and TV series reflect a deep familiarity with the subject.  Movies such as Roswell and series such as Dark Skies and Taken clearly involved detailed research into ufology.  On a personal note, my two sci-fi novels, Operation Thunder Child and Operation Lightning Strike are as much techno-thrillers as sci-fi, blending material from ufology with government and military doctrine, tactics and hardware – to the extent that they needed to be officially vetted by the MoD, prior to publication. 

When making Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Steven Spielberg used Dr J Allen Hynek as a consultant.  Hynek had been scientific consultant to the US Government’s UFO investigative program, Project Blue Book.  He even got a cameo role in the movie - for trivia buffs, he’s the guy with the beard, glasses and pipe, looking up at the mothership.  More recently, one only has to look at elements of The X-Files, both in terms of plot and visualisation, to see that Chris Carter knows ufology inside out.  I helped 20th Century Fox do some promotional work for the second X-Files movie and when I met Chris Carter at the UK premiere he confirmed that he was familiar with my MoD work on UFOs.  So while life imitates art, art imitates life.  There’s certainly a relationship between ufology and science fiction, but it’s a two-way street.

Science Fiction or Propaganda?

There are two interesting but contradictory conspiracy theories about sci-fi movies.  The first suggests that directors such as Steven Spielberg are ‘in the know’ about the existence of extraterrestrials and that their films are part of an acclimatisation campaign to get us so used to the idea that aliens might exist that it won’t come as such a culture shock and ego-blow when the President announces that we’re not alone - “Disclosure”, as many ufologists describe it.  It’s further alleged that constant depiction of hostile aliens (Independence Day, War of the Worlds, Battle: Los Angeles, etc) is part of a campaign to indoctrinate us to the idea that aliens are hostile.

The acclimatisation theory is difficult to debate with people.  Those who believe it are unlikely to be swayed by arguments to the contrary, or even by direct denials from those involved.  “He would say that, wouldn’t he?” would be the response.  The indoctrination theory, however, bears closer scrutiny and is easier to challenge.  After all, there are plenty of major sci-fi movies where the aliens seem benign.  Close Encounters of the Third Kind, E.T. and Contact spring to mind.  If sci-fi movies are propaganda in an indoctrination campaign, we’re getting remarkably mixed messages.  Proponents of the theory might argue that this reflects a reality where there are malevolent aliens and benign aliens (and maybe some neutral aliens too).  But this is currently unknowable and in any case, the whole concept of good aliens and bad aliens is hopelessly anthropocentric.

The related and contradictory conspiracy theory that I mentioned earlier also involves collusion between Hollywood and the government.  But in this one, aliens don’t exist.  Rather, the powers that be want you to believe that they do, in advance of a “false flag alien invasion” (Google the phrase if you have any doubts that such an idea would have any degree of acceptance), which would be used to usher in a New World Order.

I have personal experience of this conspiracy theory.  As a sci-fi writer and in view of my background on MoD’s UFO project, I’m often asked to do promotional work for new sci-fi movies.  This work generally involves ‘straight’ interviews about the UFO phenomenon or the scientific search for extraterrestrial life (e.g. astrobiology and the SETI project), in which – within broadcasting rules – a plug for the movie is given.  I’ve promoted films that include The X-Files: I Want to Believe, The Day the Earth Stood Still, War of the Worlds and, most recently, Battle: Los Angeles.  As a result, I’ve been accused of being a part of this conspiracy theory myself!

Proponents of these sorts of theories point to the fact that the US government has sought to influence various UFO-related movies.  But I’ve done a similar job at the MoD and can say that there’s nothing sinister about this.  The point is that filmmakers often seek to use military resources (equipment, locations and personnel) in a movie.  Self-evidently, in such a situation the military and the government will negotiate with the filmmakers to ensure that if assistance is given, the military are shown in as positive a light as possible: well-trained and equipped, well-led, able, moral, courageous, etc.  This has benefits in terms of both PR and recruiting.  And it’s not unique to sci-fi, of course.  It transcends genre.  The MoD helped with the making of the BBC Scotland sci-fi series Invasion: Earth and with action thrillers like the James Bond movie Tomorrow Never Dies.  I was involved in the negotiations on both these requests personally and yes, our assistance was conditional on the military being portrayed favourably.  If you want our help, you play by our rules.  It’s not a conspiracy – it’s common sense.

Conclusion

Hollywood is not colluding with the US government to promote belief in the reality of extraterrestrial life, either as a prelude to Disclosure, alien invasion or false flag alien invasion.  Sci-fi movies are just that – movies.  It’s about being creative, it’s about entertaining people and it’s about making money.  Sci-fi movies – even the scary ones – are there to be enjoyed.  Don’t have nightmares; do sleep well.

Author, journalist and broadcaster Nick Pope used to investigate UFOs for the Ministry of Defence and is now recognised as a leading authority on the unexplained and conspiracy theories.  He has written two science fiction novels and commentates extensively on the genre in the media.

Nick Pope can be contacted through his website: http://www.nickpope.net

Silver Screen Saucers: guest blogger exclusives

Over the next few weeks, Silver Screen Saucers will be running an exclusive mini-series of guest posts by some of the biggest names in the UFO field on the subject of UFOs and entertainment media.

The aim of this mini-series is to provide a unique insight into how today's UFO researchers view the Hollywood/UFO relationship and to afford these researchers the opportunity to comment more personally on how particular UFO movies and TV shows may have influenced their own perspectives on the phenomenon.

When complete in a few weeks time, this mini-series of guest posts will be archived as a permanently accessible feature here on Silver Screen Saucers.

Kicking off the mini-series today is Nick Pope, who needs no introduction. See here for Nick's fascinating essay summarising his own perspectives on frequently-debated issues surrounding the topic of UFOs and Hollywood...

Thursday, April 14, 2011

MIB III back on track

The third instalment of the Men in Black franchise has seen its fair share of problems to date, chief among which has been Will Smith's dissatisfaction with the film's time-travel-themed script, which led to a substantial re-write in November last year - delaying the original shooting schedule by a month.

However, production of the film - due for release May 23, 2012 - seems to be back on track with Smith's new co-star Josh Brolin (playing a younger version of Tommy Lee Jones's 'Agent K') having made his on-set debut earlier this week.

For more details and on-set photos of Smith and Brolin, see here.

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

"The First Detective Story"

On this Tuesday of Lent 5, the first reading is the story of Susanna, included in the Apocrypha. The New Oxford Annotated Bible's commentary on the apocryphal book, Susanna or Shoshana (Hebrew: שׁוֹשַׁנָּה = lily), describes it as "often called the first detective story". It is an addition to the book of Daniel, and the Greek text survives in two versions: the Septuagint text, appearing only in the Codex Chisianus; and the version of Theodotion, which appears in Roman Catholic bibles. It was regarded as a part of the Daniel literature and was placed at the beginning of the Book of Daniel in Hebrew Scripture manuscripts. 


St. Jerome (347-420), in translating the Vulgate, treated this section as a non-canonical fable. He notes that Susanna was an apocryphal addition because it was not written in Hebrew, as was the original book of Daniel, but was written in Greek. Origen observes, in his Epistola ad Africanum that it was "hidden" by the Jews in some fashion. There are no early Jewish references to the book. 


Susanna occurs in the Book of Daniel, as chapter 13, in the Scriptures of the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches, whereas Protestants generally consider it apocryphal. It is listed in Article VI of the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England and of the Episcopal Church among the books which are included in the Bible for teaching, but not for doctrinal, purposes. It is not included in the Jewish Tanakh.


As the story goes, Susanna, daughter of a possible priest, Hilkiah, and the "very beautiful" Hebrew wife of a wealthy man, Joakim, gets trapped in quite a compromising situation. She and Joakim, from the southern kingdom of Judah originally, apparently had a wonderful villa in Babylon, with a magnificent garden. Because of Joakim's honor and reputation, many folks frequently came and went at their home, including prominent community members such as elders/judges. It was customary for Susanna, once the hubbub of business had subsided in the afternoon hours, to relax by strolling alone in the ample garden. Unbeknownst to her, two of the judges who used to see her "began to lust for her", each of them separately. 


So it was that two "politicians", probably viewed as pillars of the community and upholders of justice and righteousness, secretly in their hearts ignored the principles they were committed to uphold. As it's later pointed out, in fact, one of them had been routinely terrorizing and blackmailing Israelite women into non-consensual sex. One day, as the two judges left the villa for a lunch break, both bade each other farewell and went on their way, only to backtrack, in order to peek in on Susanna. Unfortunately, the paths they chose crisscrossed and they bumped into each other. Embarrassed at catching one another "with their pants down", as it were, or almost so, they compared notes, "confessed their lust, and decided to join forces in carrying out their nefarious mission.


It was a very hot day, and Susanna, instead of walking, decides to bathe in the garden. Her attendants bring her olive oil and ointments, then leave her to herself, exiting by the side doors of the garden. The two judges seize the opportunity, run to Susanna, and confront her: "The garden doors are shut and no one can see us. We're both burning with desire for you and want you to have sex with us. If you don't, we'll tell everyone that you sent the maids away just so that you could be with a young man." Susanna realized immediately that she was trapped in a no-win situation: if she consented, she'd be stoned to death; if she refused, she'd still be hauled to public court and, to make things worse, these reprobates would be the very judges who'd condemn her to death! 


Susanna, whom the writer desribes earlier as "one who feared the Lord" and who'd been trained by her parents according to the law of Moses, declares that she's not about to give in to their perverted wishes, preferring to "fall into your hands, rather than sin in the sight of the Lord." Immediately the two men begin shouting, opening the garden doors, accusing Susanna of shameful acts, to the complete dismay of Susanna's household, friends, and even her servants who "felt very much ashamed, for nothing like this had ever been said about Susanna."


The next day everyone gathers at Joakim's home, including the two self-righteous judges who send for Susanna. She arrives "with her parents, her children, and all her relatives." The author of the story notes that Susanna was both "a woman of great refinement and beautiful in appearance." So much so that she was brought in veiled. The men, who in modern parlance could only be considered "scumbags", actually order her to be humiliated by insisting that she be unveiled [the Septuagint says "stripped"] "so that they might feast their eyes on her beauty." Lest we think it couldn't get worse than that, the author says the two judges then "laid their hands on her head" in harsh judgment, the closest they would ever get to fulfilling their hypocritical sexual fantasies, as Susanna, in tears, raises her eyes to heaven, "for her heart trusted in the Lord." The two judges proceed to repeat their false accusations, and are convincing enough that "the assembly believed them and condemned her to death." All, that is, except one young man, Daniel = Hebrew, my judge is God, standing in the crowd, in whose heart "God stirred up the holy spirit" of prophetic ability and wisdom.

Daniel interrupts the proceedings, shouting "Are you such fools, O Israelites, as to condemn a daughter of Israel without examination and without learning the facts?" This shocks everyone into a reality check, and the elders, recognizing something special in Daniel, invite him to "sit among us and inform us, for God has given you the understanding of an elder." Daniel immediately demands that the two judges be separated so that he can question each of them. He thereupon proceeds to cross-examine each of them about the details of what they saw. It quickly becomes evident that they disagree about the kind of tree under which Susanna purportedly met her imaginary lover. The Greek text employs a play on words. The first judge says that they were under a mastic = clove tree, and Daniel says that an angel stands ready to cleave the liar in two. The second judge says that they were under an evergreen oak = yew tree, and Daniel says that an angel stands ready to hew the other liar in two. The great difference in size between a mastic and an evergreen oak makes the elders' lie plain to all the observers. The author says that "out of their own mouths Daniel had convicted them of bearing false witness", and so, in accord with the law of Moses, the false accusers are summarily put to death.


It has long disappointed me that this, among other Scriptural stories, whether apocryphal or not, does not appear more in our Christian liturgies. This story is one which will certainly resonate with many in our day and age, bombarded as we are by continual exposés of sexual injustice, violence, manipulation, and demeaning of women in our society and, yes, particularly in our church communities! The story's point, I believe, is not just that virtue triumphs over ungodliness, or that, in the closing words of the story's author "from that day onward Daniel had a great reputation among the people." It's a story dealing with the inherent value and dignity of every human being, and of the absolute injustice and sinfulness of using power over another person for one's own selfish satisfaction; not only that, but of the injustice and sinfulness of allowing or promoting in our society the presumption that somehow men, particularly, have a "right" to such abuse, or the privilege of being "excused" this sort of thing: the old cliché of "Boys will be boys."  

Commentator Cherie Booth observes that the barriers and discrimination against women "are not an accidental byproduct of gender. They exist simply because of it. They rest on the idea, spoken or unspoken, that women are somehow not the equal of men, that their rights, views and interests don't carry the same weight. It is this assumption that underpins and links the pay gap in developed countries, the denial in some developing countries of a woman's right to own property, the practice of abortion or infanticide because the child is a girl, and that allows rape or honour killings to go unpunished. It is the belief that women are worth less than men.There are those who, while appalled at such prejudice in our societies, attempt to excuse it elsewhere as a result of different cultures. They argue that it is wrong to impose our standards across the world, casting doubt on the concept of universal human rights in a world of diverse cultural and religious standards. I believe this is both wrong and patronising. As Rosalyn Higgins, the first female judge on the International Court of Justice, noted, it's an argument advanced by states or by liberal scholars but rarely by the oppressed groups themselves. It's often based, too, on a false belief that the idea of universal human rights, and the UN declaration that made them concrete, is a construct of a few Western democracies foisted on a reluctant world. The declaration was drafted, in fact, by experts from every background and improved by contributions from all the UN's founding members from across the world. It was an express statement that the same human rights belong to each and every one of us, whatever our race, gender, religion or background. They are a recognition of our essential dignity as human beings, something that, I would argue, has its roots deep in all our great faiths. As such, they can't be ignored or watered down..."






  





Summer Collectio 2011 | Beach Photos

He99 Publish New Summer collection With jeans in white color, All Picture are at Beach with a Girls That also wear white Summer Dress For Girls,












 He99 Publish New Summer collection With jeans in white color

 He99 Publish New Summer collection With jeans in white color

 He99 Publish New Summer collection With jeans in white color

He99 Publish New Summer collection With jeans in white color

He99 Publish New Summer collection With jeans in white color

Monday, April 11, 2011

3 Ships

 Another exciting week as usual.  We've had 3 ships come this week.  The Robert C. Seamans is a Woods Hole Research vessel that does a semester at sea program where people learn to sail while learning oceanography, biology, or whatever the focus of the course is.  They visited us out on Tern Island last year with a University of Hawaii group.  The next ship that showed up was the Kahana, bringing us a load of fuel and will take back some of our waste.  The NOAA ship Oscar Elton Sette also stopped by.  They are putting out teams on most of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands to monitor the Hawaiian monk seals. That's along with the photography visitor group, the NOAA marine debris crew, a group waiting to take the Sette to Kure Atoll, and a team working on removing some contaminants from the island.  I'm sure I'm leaving out some good stuff, but that's good for this week.

 This is the Robert C. Seamans.  A 134 ft. brigantine rigged ship.  The weather has been cloudy lately, otherwise I would have had a better photo.  There's a better one on my Tern Island blog, let me just say, it's much nicer having piers than having to run small boats out to these ships.

 Here's another shot of the Kahana.

The Oscar Elton Sette is back for the first time this season.  

Dennis, Penny, and Joanna are cleaning out the Monument seep on Eastern Island.  We pumped the water out and scooped out a lot of the muck that harbors bacteria that produces botulism toxin.  We didn't quite finish up, but at least we got rid of the anaerobic conditions that the bacteria likes.  It fills back up with groundwater pretty quickly.

Another dangerous sinkhole opened up near the seawall due to the waves crashing over.  I had to get 6 birds out of there.  We'll get it covered up this week.

I told you last week that I moved into my new (old) house.  It was recently renovated.  There are still no blinds on the windows, but it's not bad.

This is a Laysan albatross chick.  They are getting big.  I was going to show you a picture of the Short-tailed albatross chick that I took today, but this blog program is acting goofy.  It's something for you to look forward to next week, I guess.